Take fees and produce nothing Now Canada Capitol Advisors

Mack Mackenzie funded our project, so I guess ours was better the above others. having operated businesses and seen what people are trying to sale as a "good project" is a joke. They in fact are the scammers, not Mack and his group. Yes it took a long time for our project to fund, but in talking with Mack he has taken his lumps on projects that went bust and you do not see him posting those people on the web as dead beats! Any project if it was viable will get funded in time. Unless the person is a victim of hope and thinks that their project will save the world. This is business.

We just had a run-in with him and his daughter. Tom Mckenzie goes by Mac Mackenzie and his daughter is Michalea -- with Bromot Capital Consulting. He issued an engagement letter on our Goldmine project and then when I saw all of these complaints on the internet and asked for references he flat out canceled our loan. Didn't try to explain or attempt to give us a reference. The loan terms were too good to be true; 9% - 10 yrs w/ a 5 yr balloon and no points or equity play. $12.5M loan - exactly what we requested even though the loan amount had some serious padding.

Tom McKenzie is also using Bromot Capital...same story delays, changing time lines and no actual money coming to fund a project.

Unfortunately my path crossed with Mr. Tom 'Mack' Mckenzie recently and I wont bore you with the details because they are the same as everyone else's on the internet. Investment group offering private capital, up front 'due diligence fees' etc... etc... 

When I asked him to provide some references of projects he funded he started jabbering about disclosure agreements etc... I wanted people to be aware that the latest paperwork has a company name on there of Bromot Capital Consulting claiming to have offices also in Ontario. If you google the address it will show an insurance firm, if you google Tom McKenzine, hopefully you find these threads before you pay any money to this turd.

It is a general doctrine of law in all jurisdictions that making false public 

statements against a person or firm is illegal. Commonly known as “slander” (when 

verbal) or “libel” (when written), false statements to damage someone’s reputation is 

called “defamation”. Defamation is defined by various laws in clear and uniform 

terms: “Provably false statements of verifiable fact, that serve to undermine or 

damage someone’s reputation.” It is no defence to phrase a false statement as an 

“opinion”, one’s “own experience”, or as some alleged “consumer complaint”. As 

long as the comments contain some false statements of fact that could be verified as 

false and could or should be known to be false, then it is defamation, and it is illegal. 

All defamation is illegal, and law suits against false defamers are highly 

successful and collect substantial damages from the wrongdoers. Written 

defamation (which applies to the Internet) is punished harshly, and damages usually 

do not need to be proven, as they are assumed by law due to the written exposure to 

the public. Defamation falsely accusing of fraud or professional misconduct is even 

more severely punished by “treble damages” and “punitive damages”, which can be 

enormous amounts of money far beyond any expected real damages to the victim. 

All defamation to enforce demands is criminal as extortion or blackmail, 

which are serious federal crimes in all countries. Extortion (in the USA), also called 

Blackmail (in the UK), is defined in various laws in uniform terms: “Threats or 

actions to damage a person’s reputation, to enforce a demand for anything the 

person is not obligated to give.” Defamers who use false unlawful defamation on the 

Internet, to enforce demands of things not owed to them, are committing a serious 

crime. If a person is entitled to something, they are required by law to use normal 

lawful “due process of law”, where an independent, objective and impartial court can 

apply any signed contract that governs the transaction, if there ever was any. Using 

criminal attacks by defamation to circumvent due process of law is highly illegal, and 

indicates that the person defaming probably did something illegal or criminal to 

sabotage the transaction by his own fault, if there ever was any transaction. 

Defamers know that their false statements are illegal, and that false 

defamation to enforce unlawful demands is criminal. This is why they make great 

efforts to remain anonymous, to avoid both civil and criminal liability. Experience 

shows that once an anonymous online defamer can be identified and their identity 

exposed by a reply in that forum, they stop, disappear, or begin modifying their 

statements to back-track on their lies.

All established companies fall victim to false unlawful defamation online. 

 

The more successful or important the company, the more aggressive, inflammatory 

and false are the claimed complaints, in an effort to overcome the good reputation or 

well known authority of the company being defamed. All of the most respected 

brand name banks are the subject of outrageous accusations by anonymous posts in 

online forums. Almost all law firms and accounting firms, both large and small, are 

anonymously accused of all kinds of “fraud” and “scams”, by people who claim to be 

clients. 

Almost all such false postings defaming good firms involve a demand for 

money from the accused firm. The false accusers never simply say that they just 

“hired” the firm – they cannot resist inflammatory language like the firm “took” their 

money, or they “lost” their money. Are we really expected to believe that anonymous 

postings are made out of the goodness of their hearts, out of altruistic moral desires 

to help other human beings by “warning” them of a “scam”, that they have nothing 

better to do than find ways to damage a good business reputation for the very 

doubtful and unlikely purpose of helping people they will never know? Of course not. 

Defamers spend time and energy on false and aggressive postings, because 

they are after money from the victimized firm, one way or another, only for 

themselves. Law enforcement experience is that almost every single anonymous 

online false defamation posting is almost immediately accompanied by a private 

direct email to the defamed firm making unlawful demands of money that is not 

owed, under threat of increasing pressure by false public unlawful defamation.

Contact HSBC in the Okanagan Valley British Columbia and you will see that Tom McKenzie was in FACT involved in funding a winery deal.

The man should not have lied that he had access  

to funds What goes around comes around then he starts creating pathetic web pages that make excuses but can just not show one funded project Get back under your stone thief. 

Trying to shame people that trusted him to do something Gave them his hard earned money and he still is in denial He has shut his sham so why does he not shut up He said no for so long and now he thinks people want to hear his ramblings.If he ever spoke to a serious funder no wonder they said no He is a sad old man that should go and play with his toys.Before the authorities seize them for taking money under false pretences. 

Be attentive he will try to do it under other names but remember you will get nothing from him. 

Pay the people their money back you did not do your job and never have!

This is all lies the people writing this garbage are pissed off because their projects were trash and weren't funded. These are people out for revenge anyway they can get it !

The man has been found out!